Skip to content
  • Home
  • Submission
    • WMO applicable
    • Non WMO research
    • Approval Board of Directors UMCG
    • Biobank and/or databank
  • Documents
  • Topics
    • Adverse Events (SAEs, SUSARs, SADEs, etc.)
  • Contact & Info
    • Composition METc UMCG
    • METc UMCG meetings
    • METc UMCG Fee
    • More practical information
  • FAQ
  • News
    • Availability ToetsingOnline
    • Review fee decree research files
    • ToetsingOnline becomes Research Portal (update 11-11-24)
    • Transition to CTR
    • Download requests external parties
    • Meeting dates 2025
  • English
    • Dutch
  • Home
  • Submission
    • WMO applicable
    • Non WMO research
    • Approval Board of Directors UMCG
    • Biobank and/or databank
  • Documents
  • Topics
    • Adverse Events (SAEs, SUSARs, SADEs, etc.)
  • Contact & Info
    • Composition METc UMCG
    • METc UMCG meetings
    • METc UMCG Fee
    • More practical information
  • FAQ
  • News
    • Availability ToetsingOnline
    • Review fee decree research files
    • ToetsingOnline becomes Research Portal (update 11-11-24)
    • Transition to CTR
    • Download requests external parties
    • Meeting dates 2025
  • English
    • Dutch

The role of the treating physician and investigator

The tasks and responsibilities of a treating physician are different from the responsibilities of an investigator, who is also a physician. The physician takes care of the patient, the investigator needs the cooperation of the subject for his/her research.

Clinical research distinguishes two situations:

  1. the investigator is also the treating physician of the patient/subject. In this situations the tasks and responsibilities of both functions come together in one person. From a medical-ethical point of view, this is not considered an ideal situation. It is possible that the benefit of the research does not coincide with the benefit of the patient. This dilemma may occur when selecting subjects or whether or not continued participation of the subject is in their best interest. The METc is of the opinion that, in principle, the roles of investigator and treating physician should not be carried out by a single person. However, in practice this principle is not always feasible.  In this situation the treating physician/investigator should describe how the benefit of the patient is safeguarded. Of course, the head of the department has the general responsibility for the wellbeing of the patients in his/her department.
  2. the investigator is not the treating physician of the patient/subject. This prevents a possible conflict of interest. The investigator does need the cooperation of the treating physician for the recruitment of subjects. The physician should permit the participation of his/her patient in the research. The physician will establish contact between the investigator and the potential subject. Coordination between the physician and investigator is required.

Independent expert.

In both situations article 9 of the WMO states that the subject should be able to contact an independent expert for information or advice. This independent person is not involved with the trial otherwise. The subject can ask the independent expert questions they would otherwise not ask the physician-investigator

The (contact) details of the independent expert must be listed in the subject information sheet (art. 11 WMO) and the clinical trial protocol.

Print or export to pdf
  • Home
  • Submission
  • Topics
  • FAQ
  • Documents
  • Information & contact
  • Home
  • Submission
  • Topics
  • FAQ
  • Documents
  • Information & contact

POWERED BY Wild Sea 2020

Beheer cookie toestemming
Wij gebruiken cookies om onze website en onze service te optimaliseren.
Functionele cookies Always active
De technische opslag of toegang is strikt noodzakelijk voor het legitieme doel het gebruik mogelijk te maken van een specifieke dienst waarom de abonnee of gebruiker uitdrukkelijk heeft gevraagd, of met als enig doel de uitvoering van de transmissie van een communicatie over een elektronisch communicatienetwerk.
Voorkeuren
De technische opslag of toegang is noodzakelijk voor het legitieme doel voorkeuren op te slaan die niet door de abonnee of gebruiker zijn aangevraagd.
Statistieken
De technische opslag of toegang die uitsluitend voor statistische doeleinden wordt gebruikt. De technische opslag of toegang die uitsluitend wordt gebruikt voor anonieme statistische doeleinden. Zonder dagvaarding, vrijwillige naleving door uw Internet Service Provider, of aanvullende gegevens van een derde partij, kan informatie die alleen voor dit doel wordt opgeslagen of opgehaald gewoonlijk niet worden gebruikt om je te identificeren.
Marketing
De technische opslag of toegang is nodig om gebruikersprofielen op te stellen voor het verzenden van reclame, of om de gebruiker op een website of over verschillende websites te volgen voor soortgelijke marketingdoeleinden.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
Bekijk voorkeuren
{title} {title} {title}